Uncategorized

Conventional logic vs religious logic

Yeah pretty much. “Prove” is of course reduced to absurdity, too — it’s pretty easy to “prove” you don’t have a baseball, unless your standard of proof is that you can’t trust your own senses, experiences, or reason. Meaning: nothing is true, and/or everything is true. So complete intellectual anarchy/nihilism. Ummm, nice argument, theists. LOL

Can you PROVE that you exist? Can you PROVE that you have a mind? Can you PROVE I’m not a unicorn?…

[ source: Iranian atheist/agnostic movement on Facebook ]

Words of Divine Wisdom from @TheTweetOfGod

Good stuff. : ) https://twitter.com/thetweetofgod

Stands to reason.

Stands to reason.

It also pisses me off that they don’t teach my alternative theory for gravity, which is that our souls are metallic and magnetic demons living just below the earth’s crust are trying to suck out our souls and this is why we don’t float into the Sun. This theory has YET TO BE DISPROVEN.

I’m going to write an angry letter to the School Board, City Council, and to my Senator.

 

“Dad, why did God make people?…”

[ source: Facebook : Atheist Cartoon Page ]

Krugman: the frantic effort to find some example, somewhere, of austerity policies that succeeded

At this point, you might have expected austerity advocates to consider the possibility that there was something wrong with their analysis and policy prescriptions. But no. They went looking for new heroes and found them in the small Baltic nations, Latvia in particular, a nation that looms amazingly large in the austerian imagination.

At one level this is kind of funny: austerity policies have been applied all across Europe, yet the best example of success the austerians can come up with is a nation with fewer inhabitants than, say, Brooklyn. …

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/01/opinion/krugman-looking-for-mister-goodpain.html?_r=1&

10 of 121
67891011121314